HSB41 home
Changing Course home

Introduction
 
Assignments
 
The Native Americans' River
 
The River in the Revolution
 
Mills and Dams: An Engine of Economic
Development

 
Shaping The Environment: Mapping, Moving
and Bridging the Charles

 

Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge

The Charles River Bridge opened in 1786, a 1,503 foot masterpiece that replaced a Harvard-operated ferry service between Boston and Charlestown. The bridge paid for its construction and operating expenses, and turned a profit for its investors, by charging a toll. The bridge was so financially successful that in 1793 it was followed by the even longer West Boston Bridge, on the site of today's Longfellow Bridge. A third bridge, known as Craigie's Bridge, connected Boston and East Cambridge in 1809. And two more bridges were built at River Street and Western Avenue in 1810 and 1824. These were all draw-bridges, which allowed masted vessles to sail along the river. The first permanent bridge across the Charles was the Longfellow Bridge (1906).

In 1828, Massachusetts authorized a second toll bridge between Boston and Charlestown, known as the Warren Bridge. The new bridge was to be just 300 feet upstream from the Charles River Bridge, and planned to be toll-free after six years of operation. Harvard College, which originally protested the new bridge, was to be paid half the annuity owed by the Charles River Bridge proprietors. During and after construction of the new Warren Bridge, the owners of the Charles River Bridge claimed the state had granted them an implied monopoly on the bridge. The case went all the way to the United States Supreme court in 1831, but was not ultimately decided for six years. The court's opinion was written by Chief Justice Roger Taney, who Andrew Jackson had appointed in 1835. Taney declared that the public interest was the overriding concern in the case, and so allowed the Warren Bridge to operate. He worried that allowing the Charles River Bridge's charter to stand would block progress and internal improvements. The case has had profound importance in shaping judicial authority over property rights, corporations, charters and issues of equal access to economic development.

Links on the Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge case:

 

 

   

 Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College